An examination of the hamstring and the quadriceps muscle kinematics during the front and back squat in males
Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, Vol: 9, Issue: 1, Page: 37-45
2022
- 1Citations
- 442Usage
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage442
- Downloads334
- Abstract Views108
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
The aim of the current investigation was to examine the influence of the front and back squat variants on the hamstring and the quadriceps muscles kinematics. Eighteen male participants were recruited with 1 repetition maximum values of 122.7 ±16.4 and 88.7 ±13.9 kg for the back and front squat lifts. Participants completed both back and front squats at 70% of their front squat 1 repetition maximum. The hamstring and the quadriceps muscle kinematics were determined during kinetic situations using motion capture data, in addition to segmental and joint kinematics. Differences between squat conditions were examined using paired samples t-tests. The results showed that there were no differences in either segmental/joint or muscle kinematics between the front and back squat lifts. These findings lead to the conclusion that neither the front nor the back squat conditions differ in terms of their eccentric and concentric recruitment of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.
Bibliographic Details
https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol9/iss1/4; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol9/iss1/4
https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol9/iss1/4/; http://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.09.1.04; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol9/iss1/4; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1323&context=journal; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol9/iss1/4; https://www.balticsportscience.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1323&context=journal; https://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.09.1.04
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know