Sensitivity to pain and strategies of coping with stress in combat athletes
Baltic journal of Health and Physical Activity, Vol: 2017, Issue: 4, Page: 167-174
2022
- 1Citations
- 657Usage
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage657
- Downloads500
- Abstract Views157
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
The aim of the study was to assess the perception of pain (threshold and tolerance to pain of the combat athletes in comparison to those not practicing any sport and checking whether there is a correlation between the pain perception and strategies for coping with stress in both studied groups. The study was conducted on 273 healthy men. The test group consisted of 203 athletes; the control group consisted of 70 students from the Faculty of Physical Culture, University of Szczecin. The test of the threshold and pain tolerance was performed using an algometer manufactured by Quirumed Company. To assess strategies of coping with stress, the Inventory Measuring Coping Skills – Mini-Cope was used. The test results of feeling pain at rest showed that the athletes achieved significantly higher threshold and pain tolerance compared to non-athletes. Contact athletes often deal with the problem in a proactive manner. Compared to the control group, athletes have less sensitivity to pain. Compared with nonathletes, athletes are more likely to cope with stress in an active way and reveal stronger tendency to see positive sides of a problem.
Bibliographic Details
https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol9/iss4/14; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol9/iss4/14
https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol9/iss4/14/; http://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.09.4.14; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/journal/vol9/iss4/14; https://dcgdansk.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1368&context=journal; https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol9/iss4/14; https://www.balticsportscience.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1368&context=journal; https://dx.doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.09.4.14
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know