Razvoj modela kriterijev za odločanje o uvedbi elektronske hrambe dokumentov
Economic and Business Review, Vol: 13, Issue: 5
2011
- 1Citations
- 113Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage113
- Downloads92
- Abstract Views21
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The article deals with the importance and necessity of research on electronic storage of documents. No empirical research has been conducted in Slovenia on the relationship between regulatory complexity and its impact on decision-making when implementing electronic document storage in compliance with the law. The aim of the research is therefore to shed light on the issue of legally compliant electronic storage in the context of Slovenian regulations in comparison with other European countries and, based on the research findings, to propose recommendations for their development and the creation of a systematic approach and scientific knowledge on document storage. The research is not yet complete. The article proposes a conceptual multi-criteria model that allows organizations to choose their optimal solution for electronic storage. The model is in the testing phase. The success of the decision to implement electronic document storage can be significantly improved by the multi-criteria decision model. This is very important to support decision making in difficult situations where different indicators occur that influence the decision on the introduction of electronic document storage based on the defined criteria. The initial results of the study show several important findings that may strongly influence the normative regulation of electronic document storage in the future.
Bibliographic Details
School of Economics and Business University of Ljubljana
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know