Prevalence of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in feces and raw milk of domestic cattle and sheep
Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, Vol: 10, Issue: 1
2020
- 4Citations
- 21Usage
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Usage21
- Abstract Views21
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
A total of 1060 samples of raw milk and fecal from cattle and sheep were collected from farms in the Taiwan area between September 1997 and June 1998. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) strains were isolated based on the demonstration of Vitek automicrobic system and shiga toxin-PCR after enrichment and selective procedures. The results showed that 0.4% of 231 raw milk samples were contaminated with STEC. Among the 829 fecal samples of cattle and sheep, 9% tested positive for STEC. A total of 121 STEC strains were selected and further analyzed for biochemical tests, serotype and pathogenic genes of eaeA (attaching and effacing) as well as hlyA (enterohemolysis). Results revealed that only 3% of strains lacked β-D-glucuronidase activity and 4% of strains were unable to ferment sorbitol. Thirteen percent of strains were typed as O6, O8, O15, O78, O112ac, O128, O157 and O159 with 43 O-antisera. The remaining strains were non-typeable with O-antisera. Thirty one percent of strains were determined as H2, H7, H10, H16, H19, H21, H42, H45 and H51 with 22 H-antisera. Three types of shiga toxin genes were detected with different rates, namely slt1, 39%; slt2, 33% and slt1+slt2, 28%. Seventy percent of STEC strains harbored hlyA gene and 1.6% possessed hlyA and eaeA genes. In addition, one E. coli O157:H7 strain, isolated from feces of domestic sheep, carried slt2, hlyA and eaeA genes. This study indicates that the feces of cattle and sheep were most likely the source of STEC in the Taiwan area.
Bibliographic Details
The Journal of Food and Drug Analysis (JFDA), Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan (TFDA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know