Prognostic factors in management of postoperative spondylodiscitis
Menoufia Medical Journal, ISSN: 1110-2098, Vol: 34, Issue: 2, Page: 703-708
2021
- 43Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage43
- Downloads41
- Abstract Views2
Article Description
Background Spinal infection is an uncommon disease, which may result in serious complications with potentially high morbidity and mortality. Objective The aim was to evaluate the outcome of patients with postoperative spondylodiscitis after management in relation to age, sex, general condition, symptoms, signs, radiological findings, type, and time of intervention. Patients and methods A prospective study was conducted on 20 patients having postoperative spinal infection managed in the period between June 2017 to June 2019 in the Neurosurgery Department at Menoufia University Hospitals and Al Haram Hospital. Patients with postoperative spinal infection were evaluated neurologically by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, pain was evaluated by Denis score, and they were followed up radiologically by MRI and radiography for assessment of their neurological integrity, deficits, and outcome. Results There was a statistically significant difference between postmanagement Denis pain score, ASIA score, and C-reactive protein as compared with before management (P<0.001). Outcome of the 20 patients was categorized according to Odom's criteria as follows: 12 (60%) patients had excellent outcome, six (30%) patients had good outcome, one (5%) patient had fair outcome, and one (5%) patient had poor outcome. Conclusion Among the wide variety of organisms responsible for postoperative spinal infection, we found that Staphylococcus aureus accounted for most of it. The best modality of treatment is medical treatment with antibiotics and surgical management when failure of the medical one or presence of neurological deficits.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know