Compare the differences of nurses' perceptions of risk factors and effective preventability for injurious falls between Taiwan and USA
2016
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Lecture / Presentation Description
Session presented on Sunday, July 26, 2015:Purpose: Fall related injury is one of the most common sources of hospital-acquired injuries worldwide and lots of efforts were made to prevent it. However, nurses' observations are often missing from fall incident reports. It is necessary to explore the risk factors (RF) for injurious falls and effective preventability (EP) from the nurse's perspective in different settings and countries. This study described and compared the nurses' perceptions of RF and their EP for injurious falls between Taiwan and USA.Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey study. Dr. Tzeng's questionnaire and its Chinese version with 2 cultural sensitive items were used to collect data in USA and Taiwan, respectively. Same inclusive criteria were used in these two countries and those who met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The study were conducted in one medical center in Taiwan and 5 health system for adult inpatients in USA. Three groups in perception of RF and PE factors were identified and analyzed using the percentage statistics.Results: Twenty-seven and 28 risk factors were identified as high frequency groups of RF in USA and Taiwan, respectively. Among them, 12 factors (44.4%) were found in Taiwan and USA and most of them were biological factors. Twenty-seven and 28 risk factors were identified as high EP groups in USA and Taiwan, respectively. Among them, 2 factors (7.4%) were found in Taiwan and USA. USA most of them were biological factors (51.85%), but Taiwan more of them were environmental risk factors (35.71%) and biological factors.Conclusion: This study described the status and the differences of the nurses' perceptions of RF and their EP for injurious falls between Taiwan and USA. The influences of cultural (ex: care-giver accompany), in-service education of fall (biological or environmental oriented) and health care system (ex: nurse staffing) on the frequency of RF and their EP for injurious falls were discussed and several suggestions were also proposed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know