Fault tree analysis_ The proposal of simple simulation
2021
- 93Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage93
- Views83
- Downloads10
Dataset Description
The aim of the research paper is to calculate the probability of the top event - the failure of the process using the FTA and the proposal of a simulation performed to reduce the probability of failure of the top event based on the requirements of the manufacturers. We have constructed a qualitative fault tree for the production of office components packed and sealed in blister packs, which takes place on KOCH KBS - PL machinery. We defined the top event G. Then we defined events leading to top events down to individual failure factors. Based on the links between the fault tree and the probability of failure, we performed a quantitative analysis to determine the probability of failure of individual events. We found out that the probability of failure of G is 5.04%. Subsequently, by the stimulation, we have found out which factors are the most significant contributors to the reduction of the resulting probability of failure of the factor G. These are the factors: E, F, AL and D. It h...
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know