Providing Structure to Law Students: Introducing the Programmed Learning Sequence as an Instructional Tool
- 2,621Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Paper Description
There has been little empirical research conducted in law schools concerning the effectiveness of teaching students according to their individual learning styles. Boyle and Dolle conducted an empirical study at St. John's University School of Law. They assessed the learning-styles preferences of a first-year law student population and measured the effectiveness of a particular type of instructional tool - the Programmed Learning Sequence manuals (PLS). The law students indicated in their assessments that they were diverse in their learning style; additionally, the students indicated that they strongly preferred structured and tactual materials. The PLS is a highly structured and tactual strategy for conveying information on any academic subject. Boyle and Dolle selected the topic of legal research for the PLS manuals. The empirical study contrasted how well law students learned legal research from traditional methods, such as classroom lecture with some visual aids, with how well they learned it with the PLS manuals. The findings were that students who used PLS manuals performed significantly better than those taught through traditional methods.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know