The proprietary foundations of corporate law
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, ISSN: 0143-6503, Vol: 27, Issue: 3, Page: 429-465
2007
- 44Citations
- 1,356Usage
- 51Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Recent work in both the theory of the firm and of corporate law has called into question the appropriateness of analysing corporate law as 'merely' a set of standard form contracts. This article develops these ideas by focusing on property law' s role in underpinning corporate enterprise. Rights to control assets are a significant mechanism of governance in the firm. However, their use in this way predicates some arrangement for stipulating which parties will have control under which circumstances. It is argued that 'property rules' - a category whose scope is determined functionally - protect the entitlements of parties to such sharing arrangements against each other's opportunistic attempts to grant conflicting entitlements to third parties. At the same time, the legal system uses a range of strategies to minimize the costs such protection imposes on third parties. The choice of strategy significantly affects co-owners' freedom to customize their control-sharing arrangements. This theory is applied to give an account of the 'proprietary foundations' of corporate law, which has significant implications for the way in which the subject's functions are understood and evaluated. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34548499348&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm009; https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ojls/gqm009; http://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-pdf/27/3/429/4488955/gqm009.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm009; https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-abstract/27/3/429/1579701?redirectedFrom=fulltext; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1150625; https://ssrn.com/abstract=1150625
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know