CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Financial Distress
SSRN Electronic Journal
2009
- 1Citations
- 4,187Usage
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper examines the relation between CEO overconfidence and corporate financial distress. We investigate whether CEO overconfidence accounts for corporate financial distress using U.S. data from 1980 to 1994. We use CEOs’ private portfolio and their press coverage as proxies for overconfidence to test our hypothesis. We find that optimistic CEOs make biased investing decisions and reduce stockholder wealth. We also find that stock owner and vested options confirm that managerial overconfidence is more likely to go bankruptcy. Interestingly, overconfident CEOs mentioned in the Wall Street Journal will decrease the incidence of occurrence of corporate financial distress.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know