PlumX Metrics
SSRN
Embed PlumX Metrics

The Unprincipled Punishment of Repeat Offenders: A Critique of California's Habitual Criminal Statute

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, 1990
  • 0
    Citations
  • 1,632
    Usage
  • 0
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Usage
    1,632
    • Abstract Views
      1,480
    • Downloads
      152
  • Ratings
    • Download Rank
      388,452

Paper Description

Recidivist statutes in the United States come in many shapes and sizes. Some impose short jail terms on habitual traffic offenders, while others mandate life sentences for all third felony offenders. Among the most noteworthy of modern recidivist statutes is the California Habitual Criminal Statute, §667 of the California Penal Code. Section 667 is, without a doubt, the harshest of California's many recidivist provisions. This note presents a detailed critique of §667. It argues that §667 is inconsistent with each of the four generally accepted punishment theories: retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation. And, in the absence of repeal, California courts should interpret §667 as narrowly as possible. And finally, this note proffers an alternative to §667 that would attempt to limit penalty enhancements to those specific offenders who are considered exceptionally likely to commit serious crimes once released from prison, and to assign such enhancements in a fair and proportionate fashion.

Bibliographic Details

Markus D. Dubber

Recidivism; punishment theory; repeat offenders

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know