PlumX Metrics
SSRN
Embed PlumX Metrics

Reason Without Vote: The Representative and Majoritarian Function of Constitutional Courts

Chapter in: Democratizing Constitutional Law: Perspectives on Legal Theory and Legitimacy of Constitutionalism, Springer, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-28369-2
2016
  • 0
    Citations
  • 4,985
    Usage
  • 0
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Usage
    4,985
    • Abstract Views
      3,872
    • Downloads
      1,113
  • Mentions
    2
    • Blog Mentions
      2
      • Blog
        2
  • Ratings
    • Download Rank
      39,445

Paper Description

This essay starts with a brief overview of some of the changes and new developments in constitutional law in the past decades. It also provides a brief account of the ascent of the Judiciary in most democracies, as well as the expansion of constitutional jurisdiction throughout the world. The main topic of the essay, however, are the two roles played by constitutional courts in our days: the counter-majoritarian role, which is widely studied by constitutional theory, and the representative role of such courts, a subject that has been neglected by constitutional scholars in general, with few exceptions. The argument is developed in a cosmopolitan fashion, drawing from authors and experiences from different parts of the world; however, it uses the court of a new democracy – the Supreme Court of Brazil – as a case study. In polities in which the legislature struggles with a major democratic deficit – and until it can be properly overcome – it may be the case, under certain circumstances, that it will be up to the Supreme Court to be responsive to unattended social demands presented as legal claims of rights. Furthermore, in some exceptional situations, the Court may need to play the part of an enlightened vanguard, pushing history forward. At the conclusion, though, the essay emphasizes the idea of institutional dialogues as the best path between legislative omission and judicial supremacy.

Bibliographic Details

Luís Roberto Barroso

Constitutional law; Constitutional Courts and Supreme Courts; Judicial Review; Democratic legitimacy; Roles of Courts; Constitutional dialogues

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know