Regulating Accountability: An Early Look at the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR)
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2021
- 3,116Usage
- 13Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Crown directors’ bonuses in doubt as BEAR considered for casino execs
Crown Resorts’ directors and executives’ lucrative bonuses are under threat after counsel assisting a royal commission into the casino giant recommended the banking executive accountability
Article Description
Following its enactment in early 2018, the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) came into force for the largest Australian banks from July 2018, and for all other authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) from July 2019. This research examines the experiences of ADIs in implementing the BEAR. The research specifically considers benefits and drawbacks of the BEAR and moderators that might prevent it from achieving its goals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85110771946&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775275; https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3775275; https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775275; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3775275; https://ssrn.com/abstract=3775275
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know