Legal Interventions to Counter COVID-19 Denialism
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2021
- 1Citations
- 3,386Usage
- 3Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Amid a public health crisis, the Supreme Court could be poised to stop Biden’s vaccine mandates
A school worker in Des Moines, Iowa, gets a COVID-19 vaccine. Credit: Phil Roeder. CC By 2.0. The rapid development of safe and effective COVID-19
Article Description
A series of denialist state laws thwart efficacious public health emergency response efforts despite escalating impacts of the spread of the Delta variant during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, public and private actors are fighting back to obstruct or reverse anti-public health maneuvers through legal challenges focused on (1) constitutional structural- and rights-based challenges; (2) use of conditional spending requirements; (3) federal preemption; (4) disability and other anti-discrimination laws; (5) waivers or routine uses of public health powers; and (6) civil liability claims.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178544597&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911198; https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3911198; https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911198; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3911198; https://ssrn.com/abstract=3911198
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know