Entry Barriers in Fintech
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2022
- 3,551Usage
- 6Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
From Pre-Seed to Series A: Navigating the Key Stages of Product Development
\ Getting a software startup off the ground might seem like an easy task, especially compared to businesses that require physical machinery. But besides getting
Article Description
Despite its disruptive impact on legacy financial institutions, processes, and services, the use of new technologies in finance has many potential consumer welfare benefits and market efficiencies. Yet new financial technology (fintech) firms often face significant barriers to entry. This chapter identifies the core entry barriers that new firms face when attempting to enter the market for technology-mediated financial services. Restrictive fintech entry barriers experienced to date across global markets include financial and human capital acquisition challenges, market concentration forces, economies of scale and scope, service-bundling, market integration and infrastructure access concerns, network effects from multi-layered platform enterprises, consumer financial data access, portability and control barriers, concerns relating to technology infrastructure, standardization and interoperability, regulatory imposed entry barriers and uncertainties, and consumer perceptions of stability and trust. This chapter concludes with policy recommendations to alleviate fintech market entry barriers while ensuring appropriate consumer and financial system protections and safeguards.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176976722&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4199669; https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4199669; https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4199669; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4199669; https://ssrn.com/abstract=4199669
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know