Constitutional Crimes
North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 99, (Forthcoming 2024)
2023
- 1,010Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Paper Description
Studies of criminal laws tend to focus on statutory, regulatory, and common law offenses. And discussions of constitutional law often revolve around abstract, concise statements that are either in, or that mirror the contents of, the federal Constitution. In the interest of exploring new territory in both fields, this Article introduces and analyzes a family of crimes that has gone unanalyzed until now: criminal laws that appear in the text of the US Constitution and state constitutions. As it turns out, there are a host of criminal laws contained in the federal and state constitutions, ranging from widespread crimes against treason, bribery, criminal contempt, and corrupt solicitation, to niche offenses including prohibitions on certain forms of net fishing, the theft of legislative bills, stem cell and cloning practices, and bingo-related crimes. In this Article, I present the first survey and taxonomy of these constitutional crimes. Along the way, I uncover nuances that have previously gone unnoticed—such as an unexplored set of state constitutional treason provisions that are significantly broader than the US Constitution’s treatment of the crime. I address parallels and patterns between the states—highlighting common constitutional crimes and reasons for their inclusion in constitutions rather than the statute books. Beyond the survey and exploration, I conduct an initial, higher-level analysis of constitutional crimes, including their implications for research into constitutional drafting, constitutional interpretation, the democratic legitimacy of state and federal constitutions, and zombie constitutional provisions. Still, much remains to be said about constitutional crimes. To that end, the Article concludes with a research agenda that identifies additional aspects of constitutional crimes that are worth exploring.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know