Public-Private Cooperation in Global Security Governance – Entanglement, Infrastructure and the Affordances of Fundamental Rights
Forthcoming in Jan Klabbers (ed.), International Organizations Engaging the World (CUP 2024).
2024
- 339Usage
- 1Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
The Promise and Perils of Human Rights for Governing Digital Platforms: Symposium Introduction
This essay is part of a symposium on the promise and perils of human rights for governing digital platforms. Read more from the series here;
Paper Description
This chapter traces the many entanglements between international organisations and private actors in the space of global security governance. By analyzing the controversies surrounding the revised legal mandate of Europol and the contribution of private actors in countering terrorism online, the chapter describes three modalities of this entanglement: (i) the role of private actors as sites of data collection and providers of sources of information that are increasingly relied upon by international institutions, (ii) the enrolment of private platforms in the implementation of governance projects by international organizations, and (iii) the attunement of such governance projects to the experimental, opportunistic and flexible logic of tech companies and platforms – what Fleur Johns has described as a ‘lean start up’ mentality. Having traced these multiple points of influence, interaction and interdependence, the chapter further proposes an infrastructural approach to the study of such public-private cooperation. This implies a recognition of how law and materiality are entangled in the production of social order, and an attentiveness to the role of digital infrastructures and socio-technical protocols in redrawing the public-private divide and constituting, mediating and materialising the exercise of international institutional authority. These observations crystalize in an urgent call to direct our thinking on rights and regulation towards these infrastructural formations and the political affordances that they entail.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know