Get it and Take it - Mental Health Treatments and The Choice to Not be Treated
2024
- 249Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Paper Description
Mental illnesses are becoming more prevalent, and the efficacy of treatment can sometimes fall short of expectations. To understand the role played by patient and physician in determining treatment efficacy, we estimate a structural model featuring physician-patient interaction. The model highlights the pivotal role physicians play in treatment selection, while also recognizing that patients have the autonomy to decline treatment. We find that patients value their mental health while responding to treatment costs. Furthermore, physicians appear to weigh their benefits more heavily than patient health outcomes. Policy measures aimed at cutting costs show mixed results, influenced by the treatment approach and doctors' altruism levels. Standalone efforts to promote patient adherence and physician altruism show minimal benefits for mental health. Therefore, a combined strategy that addresses altruism, compliance, cost management, and patient care may improve overall mental health outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know