Dividend Taxes and Implied Cost of Capital
SSRN Electronic Journal
2003
- 6Citations
- 8,081Usage
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We estimate firms' implied cost of capital and examine the effects of dividend taxes on this ex ante measure. The results support the dividend tax capitalization hypothesis. We find a positive relation between implied cost of equity capital and dividend yield that is decreasing in aggregate institutional ownership. We further explore the effect of institutional ownership on the dividend tax premium by partitioning institutional owners into groups of homogeneous investors. We find evidence that ownership by certain groups of tax-favored institutions, including insurance companies, endowments, and pensions, decreases the dividend tax premium and that ownership by mutual funds, non-tax-favored institutions, does not significantly affect the dividend tax premium. Although banks do not face the dividend tax penalty that individual investors face, we do not find that the dividend tax premium is decreasing in ownership by banks, contrary to our predictions. We believe that this exploration paves the way for future research that can identify stronger settings within which to examine the effects of institutional owners' tax attributes on the dividend tax premium.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know